1.5. Efficiency and Justice - Readings
Required Reading:
- Sandel, 2009, “Justice” Lectures 5 (Free to Choose) and 14 (A Deal is a Deal)
These are lectures from Michael Sandel’s Justice class at Harvard, one of the most popular courses. Due to the way these videos are cut, I encourage (but don’t require) you to watch part of the lecture immediately following each lecture mentioned above (e.g. lectures 6 and 15) as it continues the relevant discussions.
Recommended Reading:
You may wish to glance at some of the Wikipedia pages on the two major books from which themes and opposing perspectives we discuss come from:
Tips and Questions to Read for:
The videos cover a lot of ground on different political philosophies and their consequences, but our main points we want to focus on is Rawls vs. Nozick on “social/distributive justice.”
What is social/distributive justice? How might we define it?
Do you agree more with Nozick or Rawls?
Where are there points of tension and/or agreement between the two positions?
Is/how can coercive redistribution (be) just(ified)?
Is/how can (in)equality (be) just(ified)?
How do Nozick and Rawls each answer the question: what makes a distribution just or unjust?
What is the best way to provide for those least well off?